Foucault’s Discourse and Gramsci’s Hegemony as Instruments of Critical Engagement in the Age of Globalization
Abstract
This contribution compares discourse and hegemony through their distinctive elaboration in the humanities and the social sciences by two major twentieth century theoreticians, Michel Foucault and Antonio Gramsci. In discourse Foucault unmasks the speaker’s – or the scientist’s - conscious and unconscious intentions in representing phenomena as if they were part of a coherent and readable whole. This whole results from an ensemble of discursive practices which prescribe what can be accepted and what has to be excluded within a certain social formation, a body of recognized and authoritative knowledge crucial in managing and maintaining power. Gramsci also acknowledges a close link between knowledge and power, but his idea of hegemony, unlike foucauldian discourse, does not deny the possibility of political agency through which individuals can forge a political strategy to improve their lot. Discourse and hegemony are nowadays essential tools for gauging social confrontations and understanding forms of coercion or negotiations in cultural exchange.
Downloads
References
Arrighi, Giovanni, Capitalismo e disordine mondiale, Roma, Manifestolibri, 2010.
Apter, Emily, “Comparative Exile. Competing Margins in the History of Comparative Literature”, in Bernheimer 1995: 86-96.
Bernheimer, Charles (ed.), Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.
Bhabha, Homi, The Location of Culture, London, Routledge, 1994.
Blanchot, Maurice, L’infinito intrattenimento. Scritti sull’insensato gioco di scrivere’, Torino, Einaudi, 1977.
Cospito, Giuseppe, “Egemonia”, in Frosini e Liguori 2004: 77-92.
Derrida, Jacques, La scrittura e la differenza, Torino, Einaudi, 1990.
Dreyfus, H.L. – Rabinow, P., La ricerca di Michel Foucault. Analitica della verità e storia del presente, Firenze, Ponte alle Grazie, 1989.
Ferris, David, “Indiscipline”, in Saussy 2006: 78-99.
Frosini, Fabio – Liguori, Guido (eds.), Le parole di Gramsci. Per un lessico dei Quaderni del carcere, Roma, Carocci, 2004.
Gramsci, Antonio, Quaderni del carcere, Torino, Einaudi, 1975.
Hall, Stuart, “Codificazione, decodificazione”, Politiche del quotidiano, Ed. Stuart Hall, Milano, Il Saggiatore, 2006.
Foucault, Michel, Dits et écrits, Paris, Gallimard 2001 (2 vols).
Foucault, Michel, Scritti letterari, Torino, Einaudi, 2004.
Foucault, Michel, Le parole e le cose. Un’archeologia delle scienze umane, Milano, RCS, 1996.
Foucault, Michel, L’archeologia del sapere. Una metodologia per la storia della cultura, Milano RCS, 1999 [1969].
Couzens Hoy, D., (ed.),
Foucault: A Critical Reader
, New York, Basil Blackwell, 1986.
Kadir, Djelal, “Comparative Literature in an Age of Terrorism”, in Saussy 2006: 68-77.
Lacan, Jacques, Il seminario, Libro III, Le psicosi 1955-1956, Torino, Einaudi, 2010.
Lavagetto,
Mario,
Freud, la letteratura e altro
, Torino, Einaudi, 1985.
Matte Blanco, Ignacio, L’inconscio come insiemi infiniti, Saggio sulla bi-logica, Torino, Einaudi, 1981.
Perniola, Mario, Contro la comunicazione, Torino, Einaudi, 2004.
Rorty, Richard, “Looking Back at Literary Theory”, in Saussy 2006: 63-67.
Said, Edward, Orientalism, London, Penguin, 2003 [1978].
Said, Edward, The World, the Text and the Critic, Cambridge MA, Harvard U.P, 1983.
Said, Edward, Nel segno dell’esilio. Riflessioni, letture e altri saggi, Milano, Feltrinelli, 2008.
Saussy, Haun (ed.), Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.
Saussy, Haun, “Exquisite Cadavers Stitched from Fresh Nightmares”, in Hall 2006: 3-42.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, Morte di una disciplina, Roma, Meltemi 2003.
Copyright Notice
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, and to adapt the work. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
