L’imagination apprivoisée : représentation et factualité dans la connaissance historique

Pier Luigi Lecis, Vinicio Busacchi


This paper aims to show how Ricœur’s inquiry on memory, trace, and testimony contributes to rebalance a framework that, at the level of the dialectic between imagination and representation, would essentially present Historian’s work as a hermeneutical work. In Ricœur’s later writings, we find a differently balanced perspective by focusing the (neurobiological and psychological) substrate of representation behind trace and memory. Representation precedes interpretation. And neither the fidelity of memory nor the epistemic truth of history belong to a game that would be solely played within the communicative space of a plurality of cognitive agents who are exchanging, controlling, and sharing their own experiences. Consequently, the reality of the past itself reemerges as the corollary of the practice of memory.

Full Text:

PDF (Français)

NBN: http://nbn.depositolegale.it/urn%3Anbn%3Ait%3Aunica-22223

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13125/CH/3147

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Pier Luigi Lecis, Vinicio Busacchi

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

Creative Commons License              ISSN 2533-1825

Critical Hermeneutics is published by the University of Cagliari - Maintenance for this OJS installation is provided by UniCA  Open Journals, hosted by Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo.