Hermeneutics ‘Reloaded’: From Science/Philosophy Dichotomy to Critical Hermeneutics

Vinicio Busacchi

doi:10.13125/CH/3144

Vinicio Busacchi Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, and Philosophy UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4818-0410

Abstract

Currently, hermeneutics is no longer a koinè, yet it pervades the field of human knowledge on different and diverse levels. With the decline of philosophical hermeneutics, the inheritance of a rich tradition of thought, there remains some very important problematic and speculative cornerstones and a poorly ordered horizon of hermeneutical practices and procedures, more or less technical and/or speculative. From this composite picture the (negative) possibility of truths without method and methods without truth or validity emerges; and therefore, again, emerge the problems of consistency, rigour and philosophical legitimacy, and the risk of non-rational seductions and/or ideological distortions. From another point of view, philosophy and reflection within hermeneutical traditions have elaborated sufficient critical content and devices for the definition of an organised, rigorous and controlled model of a comprehensive procedure. From this perspective, Paul Ricoeur’s philosophical work seems emblematic. From his philosophy it is possible to extract a general model of a non-philosophically-engaged hermeneutical method, which is valuable for the human and social sciences as well as a useful procedure for interdisciplinary work. This is critical hermeneutics: a specific form of speculative and theoretical hermeneutics whose methodological and epistemological foundation mirrors the new form of the contemporary hermeneutic-scientific koinè.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vinicio Busacchi, Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, and Philosophy UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI

Vinicio Busacchi is Associate Professor of Theoretical Philosophy and a Member of the Doctoral Committee at the Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, and Philosophy at the University of Cagliari, Italy. He a Member of the interdisciplinary research group on “Psychoanalysis, Hermeneutics and Phenomenology” in Rome. His research interests are focused in hermeneutics, epistemology of the social sciences, theory of psychoanalysis, historical knowledge. He has published various articles on the philosophy of psychoanalysis, neuroscience, anthropology, and the philosophy of history. His published books include Ricœur vs. Freud (Paris, 2011), Pour une herméneutique critique (Paris, 2013), The Recognition Principle: A Philosophical Perspective between Psychology, Sociology and Politics (Newcastle, 2015); Habermas and Ricoeur’s Depth Hermeneutics. From Psychoanalysis to a Critical Human Science (Cham, 2016).

References

AA.VV. (2003). Ermeneutica. Milano: RaffaelloCortina.

Bianco, F. (2002). Introduzione all’ermeneutica, Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Busacchi, V. (2013). Pour une herméneutique critique. Etudes autour de Paul Ricoeur, Paris: Harmattan.

Busacchi, V. (2015). The Ricoeurian Way: Towards a Critical Hermeneutics for the Human and Social Sciences. American International Journal of Social Science (AIJSS), 4(6), 82–88.

Dilthey, W. (1966). Preisschrift ueber die Hermeneutik Schleiermachers. Archiv für Geschichte del Philosophie, 1893; in Gesammelte Schriften, 14(2), Göttingen.

Dummett, M. (1986). A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs: Some Comments on Davidson and Hacking. In E. Lepore, ed. (1986), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Oxford: Blackwell.

Ferraris, M. (1998). L’ermeneutica. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Grünbaum, A. (1984). Philosophical Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Hesse, M. (1980). Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Brighton: Harvester Press.

Marconi, D. (2007). Per la verità. Relativismo e filosofia. Torino: Einaudi.

Nicoletti, E. (1989). Fenomenologia e interpretazione. Pref. by Paul Ricoeur. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Parrini, P. (1998). Ermeneutica ed epistemologia. Paradigmi. Rivista di critica filosofica, 16(46), 7–31.

Parrini, P. (2002). La psicoanalisi nella filosofia della scienza. In, Id., Sapere e interpretare. Per una filosofia e un’oggettività senza fondamenti. Milano: Guerini e Associati, 141–158.

Pellauer, D. (2014). Work to Be Done. Philosophy Today, 58(1), 1–8.

Perissinotto, L. (2002). Le vie dell’interpretazione nella filosofia contemporanea. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Recas Bayón, J. (2006). Hacia una hermenéutica crítica. Gadamer, Habermas, Apel, Vattimo, Rorty, Derrida y Ricoeur, Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca Nueva.

Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Trans. by D. Savage. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.

Ricoeur, P. (1970b). Qu’est-ce qu’un texte? Expliquer et comprendre. In AA. VV., Hermeneutik und Dialektik. Aufsätze II. Sprache und Logik. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.

Ricoeur, P. (1973). Herméneutique et critique des idéologies. Archivio di Filosofia, 43(2-4), 25–61.

Schleiermacher, F. D. E. (1977). The Aphorisms on Hermeneutics from 1805 and 1809-10. Trans. by R. Hass and J. Wojcik. Cultural Hermeneutics, 4(4), 367–390.

Vattimo, G. (1987). Ermeneutica come koinè. aut aut, 217-218, 3–11.