Strategie e configurazioni allegoriche nel Laberinto de Fortuna di Juan de Mena

  • Maurizio Virdis
Keywords: Juan de Mena, Laberinto de Fortuna, allegory, allegorical stategies, Providence, Fortune

Abstract

Juan de Mena’s Laberinto de Fortuna (1444) is built on three textual levels: a strictly allegorical one ˗ related to the problem of knowledge, the relationship between Fortune and Providence and the problem of  Time ˗ an historical-political level and a moral one. One of the main problems of Juan de Mena’s  allegorical representation lies in the representation of Time, so that, by means of this performance, the  author also shows and suggests us his own concept of Time.  

The textual allegorical strategy of the Laberinto is largely based on a double divergence: on the one hand  the text shows a divergence between the visionary-self and the experiential-self, and, on the other hand, it  shows a divergence related to time, since, effectively, the only spinning wheel is the wheel of the present,  whereas the wheel of the past and the wheel of the future remain motionless. From here stems the idea that  Fortune is essentially the Time in its arduous complexity.  

Moreover, the two terms of Juan de Mena’s allegorical discourse, Providence and Fortune, are represented  in opposite ways: the first is an hypostasis deriving from the visionary and transcendental ‘self’ of the  author; the second is primarily an absence, a pure factuality remaining undetermined, de-personified, and  not crossing the threshold of personification.  

Similarly, the labyrinth itself is absent, in a way that means the lack of discernment, in a mind not guided  by Providence. Finally, the labyrinth/laberinto performed by Juan de Mena, turns to be eminently a textual  labyrinth, where the reader needs to disentangle to get to the bottom of its meaning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BELTRÁN, Luis, “The Poet, the King and the Cardinal Virtues in Juan de Mena’s Laberinto”, «Speculum », 46.2 (1971), pp. 318-332.
BURKE, James F., “The Interior Journey and the Structure of Juan de Mena’s Laberinto de Fortuna”, «Revista de Estudios Hispánicos», 22.3 (1988), pp. 27-45.
Juan de Mena, Laberinto de fortuna, edición, introducción y notas de Maxim P. A. M. KERKHOF, Madrid, Castalia, 1997.
LAPESA, Rafael, “El elemento moral en el Laberinto de Mena: su influjo en la disposición de la obra”, «Hispanic Review», 27.3 (1959), pp. 257-266.
POST, Chandler Rathfon, “The sources of Juan de Mena”, «The Romanic Review», 3 (1912), pp. 223-279.
STREET, Florence, “The Allegory of Fortune and the Imitation of Dante in the Laberinto and Coronaçion of Juan de Mena”, «Hispanic Review», 23.1 (1955), pp. 1-11.
TAYLOR, Barry, “Juan de Mena, la écfrasis y las dos fortunas: Laberinto de Fortuna, 143- 208”, «Revista de Literatura Medieval», 6 (1994), pp. 171-181.
YORBA-GRAY, Galen B., “The Future as Eschatological Presence in Juan de Mena’s Laberinto de Fortuna”, «Journal of Christianity and Foreign Languages», 5 (2004), pp. 23-39.
Published
2013-12-31
How to Cite
Virdis, M. (2013). Strategie e configurazioni allegoriche nel Laberinto de Fortuna di Juan de Mena. Rhesis. International Journal of Linguistics, Philology and Literature, 4(2), 294-309. https://doi.org/10.13125/rhesis/5548
Section
Articoli