A new world era in the history of philosophy
Abstract
This paper supports the following theses: 1. It is necessary to affirm that all humanity has always expressed certain “core universal problems” that are present in all cultures. 2. The rational responses to these “core problems” first acquire the form of mythical narratives. 3. The formulation of categorical philosophical discourses is a subsequent development in human rationality that does not negate all mythical narratives. These philosophical discourses have arisen in all the great urban Neolithic cultures (even if only on a very beginning level). 4. Modern European philosophy confused its economic and political domination of culture and the crises derived from other regional philosophies with a Eurocentric pretention to universality, which must be questioned. 5. In any case, there are formal, universal aspects on which all regional philosophies can coincide and which respond to the “core problems” on an abstract level. 6. All of this impels us to enter a new age of inter-philosophical dialogue, respectful of differences and open to learning from the useful discoveries of other traditions. 7. A new philosophical project must be developed that, going beyond Eurocentric philosophical modernity, tries to shape a global, trans-modern pluriverse, drawing upon the development of its own resources of peripheral, subaltern, post-colonial philosophies that have been “discarded” by modernity.Downloads
References
AAVV. 2003. Sources of Chinese Tradition from earliest times to 1600, vol. 1. New York: ColumbiaUniversity Press.
Apel, Karl-Otto. 1973. Die transformation der Philosophie. Vol. 1-2. Frankfurt: Surhkamp.
Bloch, Ernst. 1959. Das Prinzip Hoffnung. Vol. 1-3. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Collins, Randall. 2000. The Sociology of Philosophies. A global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cam-bridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Dussel, Enrique. 1995. The Invention of the Americas. Continuum. New York.
Dussel, Enrique. 2007. Política de la Liberación. Madrid: Trotta.
Fornet-Betancourt, Raul. 2004. Crítica intercultural de la Filosofía Latinoamericana actual. Ma-drid: Trotta.
Goichon, M.A., a cura di. 1938. Lexique de la Langue Philosophique D ́Ibn Sina (Avicenne). Paris:Desclée de Brouwer, Paris.
Hegel, Wilhelm Friedrich. 1955 [1830]. “Die Vernunft in der Geschichte, Zweiter Entwurf”. InSämtliche Werke, a cura di Hoffmeister & Meiner. Hamburg.
Hegel, Wilhelm Friedrich. 1970. “Vorlesung über die Philosophie der Geschichte”. In Werke,vol.12. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, Wilhelm Friedrich. 1990. The Philosophy of History. New York: Colonial Press.
Hountondji, Paulin. 1977. Sur la philosophie africaine. Critique de l ́ethnophilosophie. París: Mas-pero.
Husserl, Edmund. 1970. “Philosophy as Mankind ́s Self-Reflection; the Self-Realization ofReason”, in The Crisis of European Sciencies. Evanston: NorthWestern University Press.
Kongzi Jiayu. 2003. Confucius Analects. Trad. da Edward Slingerland. Indianapolis: HackettPublishing Company.
Pomeranz, Kenneth. 2000. The Great Divergence. China, Europe and the Making of the ModernWorld Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1963. La symbolique du mal. París: Aubier.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1964. “Civilization universelle et cultures nacional”, in Histoire et Verité. París:Seuil. pp. 274-288.
Semerano, Giovanni. 2005. La favola dell ́indoeuropeo. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
Sobrevilla, David. 1999. Repensando la tradición de Nuestra América. Lima: Banco Central deReserva del Perú.
Tempel, Placide. 1949. La philosophie Bantue. París: Présence Africaine.
Te-King, Tao. 1950. Les Pères du Système Taoïste. A cura di Léon Wieger. París: Les Belles Le-ttres, Paris.
Yabri, Abid. 2001a. Crítica de la razón árabe. Barcelona: Icaria-Antrazyt.
Yabri, Abid. 2001b. El legado filosófico árabe. Alfarabi, Avicena, Avempace, Averroes, Abenjaldun.Madrid: Trotta.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1980-1989. The Modern World-System. Vol. 1-3. New York: AcademicPress.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Licenza Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).