Phenomenology of Reading

  • Mattia Petricola University of L'Aquila
  • Georges Poulet

Abstract

Poulet’s classic article on the aesthetic experience of literature is here translated in Italian for the first time. Phenomenology of Reading occupies an interesting place both within the landscape of Poulet’s own critical production and within the broader context of literary theories that, between 1960 and 1980, explored the aesthetic experience of literature in relation to the act of reading. Inspired by Proust, Poulet conceives of reading as the act of subjectivizing within ourselves a consciousness that is not our own. This other consciousness is the work itself, whose textual objectivity—that is, the words that compose it and convey its meanings—serves as a vehicle for the subjectivity that animates it and which constitutes the true core of that consciousness. This theoretical framework carries profound philosophical implications: in a world where our consciousness is condemned never to fully grasp another person’s interiority, knowing and understand it as if it were our own, the experience of literature offers the possibility of doing precisely that.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mattia Petricola, University of L'Aquila

Mattia Petricola is a PhD student in comparative literature at the University of Bologna and at the University of Paris-Sorbonne, researching intermediate states between life and death in literature, cinema and comics from E.A. Poe to today. He holds a Master of Philosophy in Italian Studies from the University of Pisa. His research interests include thanatology, speculative fiction, video art and queer hermeneutics. He has presented papers on Philip K. Dick, Peter Greenaway, queer and spectrality studies.

References

Bippart, Graham, “The Spirit of Prospero: Fiction and Identity in Georges Poulet’s Phenomenology of Reading”, Comparative Humanities Review, 1.1 (2007): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/468372.
Colton, Valentine, “Vers une génétique de la critique : le cas de Georges Poulet”, Genesis, 46 (2018): 173–81. https://doi.org/10.4000/genesis.2814.
Cryle, Peter, “Playful Theory: Georges Poulet’s Phenomenological Thematics”, Culture, Theory and Critique, 49.1 (2008): 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735780802024224.
Iser, Wolfgang, “The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach”, New Literary History, 3.2 (1972): 279-299. https://doi.org/10.2307/468316.
Iser, Wolfgang, Der implizite Leser. Kommunikationsformen des Romans von Bunyan bis Beckett, Monaco, Wilhelm Fink, 1972.
Iser, Wolfgang, Der Akt des Lesens. Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung (1976), tr. it. L'atto della lettura. Una teoria della risposta estetica, trad. di Rodolfo Granafei e Chiara Dini, Bologna Il Mulino, 1987.
Lowall, Sarah, Critics of Consciousness, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1968.
Macksey, Richard – Donato, Eugenio (a c. di), The Structuralist Controversy. The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, Baltimora, John Hopkins University Press, 1972 (1970).
Poulet, Georges, Études sur le temps humain, Parigi, Plon, 1956 (1949).
Poulet, Georges, “La pensée critique de Marcel Raymond”, Saggi e ri-cerche di letteratura francese, 3 (1963): 203-229.
Poulet, Georges, “Le pensée critique de Jean Starobinski”, Critique, 19 (1963): 387-410.
Poulet, Georges, “Criticism and the Experience of Interiority”, The Structuralist Controversy. The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, Ed. Richard Macksey, Eugenio Donato, Baltimora, John Hopkins University Press, 1972 (1970): 56-88.
Poulet, Georges, La conscience critique (1971), tr. it. La coscienza critica, a c. di Giovanni Bogliolo, Bologna, Marietti, 1991.
Rosenblatt, Louise M. «Literature: The Reader’s Role». The English Journal, 49.5 (1960): 304-310. https://doi.org/10.2307/810700.
Yu, Pauline, “Georges Poulet and the Symbolist Tradition”, Criticism, 16.1 (1974): 39–57.
Published
2025-05-31
How to Cite
Petricola, M., & Poulet, G. (2025). Phenomenology of Reading. Between, 15(29), 230-259. https://doi.org/10.13125/2039-6597/6652
Section
Unpublished in Italy. Critical Essays in Translation