Some pioneering transplants in early 20th century Russian science fiction: Bulgakov, Tolstoy, Belyayev
Abstract
In this article, the author turns his attention to two specific literary motifs from Russian science fiction literature of the early 1920s: surgically obtained rejuvenation and pioneering transplantation between animal and human organs, in particular brain transplantation. These elements are present in important, mostly contemporary literary works by Mikhail Bulgakov (Heart of a Dog), Aleksey Tolstoy (The Blue Cities), and Alexander Belyayev (Hoity-Toity). By means of a contrastive analysis of these literary motifs in the works of these writers and a reconstruction of the Russian and Soviet 1920s scientific context that generated them, when medicine made enormous strides, the author will attempt to find a connection between these works and thus determine the existence of a common pattern that justifies the similarities in the thematic and stylistic approach of their authors.
Downloads
References
Bar-Sella, Zeev, Aleksandr Beljaev, Moskva, Molodaja gvardija, 2013.
Barag, Lev - Berezovskij, Ivan - Kabašnikov, Konstantin - Novikov, Nikolaj, Sravnitel’nyj ukazatel’ sjužetov. Vostočnoslavjanskaja skazka, Leningrad, Nauka, 1979.
Beljaev, Aleksandr, Golova professora Douėlja. Povesti i rasskazy, Moskva, Pravda, 1986.
Bulgakov, Michail, Cuore di cane: ovvero endocrinologia della NEP, Bari, De Donato, 1967.
Bulgakov, Michail, “Sobač’e serdce. Povest’”, Znamja, 6 (1987): 73-141.
Bulgakov, Michail, Sobranie sočinenij v pjati tomach. Tom II, Moskva, Chudožestvennaja literatura, 1989.
Bulgakov, Michail, Romanzi e racconti, Roma, Newton Compton, 1995.
Campbell, John W., Analog 6, London, Dobson books, 1969.
Caratozzolo, Marco (ed.), San Nicola nel folclore slavo orientale, Bari, DiPagina, 2024.
Cifariello, Alessandro, “Divinità e scienza in Čelovek-amfibija di Aleksandr Beljaev: altri mondi possibili, tra pensiero cosmista e fantascienza sovietica”, Between, XIV.27 (2024): 53-76. doi: 10.13125/2039-6597/5851
Demichov, Vladimir, Peresadka žiznenno važnych organov v ėksperimente, Moskva, Medicinskoe Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel’stvo, 1960.
Ėnnker, Benno, Formirovanie kul’ta Lenina v Sovetskom Sojuze, Moskva, ROSSPĖN, 2011.
Fëdorov, Nikolaj, Sobranie sočinenij v četyrёch tomach. Tom I, Moskva, Progress, 1995.
Giuliani, Rita, “Il tema del ringiovanimento in Michail Bulgakov e in Italo Svevo (Cuore di cane e La rigenerazione)”, Toronto Slavic Quarterly, 64 (2018): 1-16.
Giuliani De Meo, Rita, Michail Bulgakov, Roma,La Nuova Italia, 1981.
Gljancev, Sergej, “Fenomen genial’nosti: k voprosu o vozniknovenii i razvitii idei iskusstvennogo krovoobraščenija”, Filosofskaja škola, 9 (2019): 78-86.
Gopman, Vladimir, “Naučnaja fantastika”, Literaturnaja ėnciklopedija terminov i ponjatij, red. Aleksandr Nikoljukin, Moskva, Intelvak: 621-625.
Jakubovskij, Maksim - Edwards, Malcolm, The SF book of lists, Berkley, Berkley books, 1983.
Loščilov, Igor’, “Carica much Nikolaja Zabolockogo: bukva, imja i tekst”, «Strannaja» prosa i «strannaja» poėzija, Pjataja strana, Moskva, 2003: 86‑104.
Masing-Delic, Irene, “‘The chickens also want to live’: a motif in Zabolotskij’s Columns”, The Slavic and East European Journal, 3 (1987): 356-369.
Masing-Delic, Irene, Abolishing Death. A Salvation Myth in Russian Twentieth-Century Literature, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1992.
Mjagkov, B.S., “Bulgakovskie mesta (Literaturno-topografičeskie očerki)”, Tvorčestvo Michaila Bulgakova. Issledovanija. Materialy. Bibliografija. Kniga I, Leningrad, Nauka, 1981: 142-174.
Morgošija, Temuri, “Naučnyj podvig S.S. Brjuchonenko – vydajuščegosja fiziologa-novatora i sozdatelja metoda iskusstvennogo krovoobraščenija (k 130-letiju so dnja roždenija)”, Kardiologija i serdečno-zasudistaja chirurgija, 3 (2022): 314-320.
Kol’cov, Nikolaj (еd.), Omoloženie. Sbornik statej, Moskva-Petrograd, Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel’stvo, 1923.
Kol’cov, Nikolaj (еd.), Omoloženie. Vtoroj sbornik statej, Moskva-Petrograd, Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel’stvo, 1924.
Orlando, Francesco, Il soprannaturale letterario. Storia, logica e forme, Torino, Einaudi, 2017.
Piretto, Gian Piero, Il radioso avvenire. Mitologie culturali sovietiche, Torino, Einaudi, 2001.
Ripellino, Angelo Maria, Letteratura come itinerario del meraviglioso, Torino, Einaudi, 1968.
Sidorčik, Andrej, “Metod doktora Voronova. Kak prototip professora Preobraženskogo potrjas mir”, Argumenty i fakty, 16/10/2019, https://aif.ru/society/history/metod_doktora_voronova_kak_prototip_professora_preobrazhenskogo_potryas_mir (ultimo accesso 8/03/2024).
Sokolov, Boris, Bulgakovskaja ėnciklopedija, Moskva, Lokid Mif, 1997.
Sokolova, Majja, “’Ja postavil cel’ju pokazat’ mnogoobrazie vkusov čeloveka buduščego…’”, Aleksandr Beljaev, Golova professora Douellja. Povesti i rasskazy, Moskva, Pravda, 1986: 453-462.
Suvin, Darko, Positions and Suppositions in Science Fiction, London, Macmillan, 1988.
Todorov, Tzvetan, Introduction à la littérature fantastique, Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1970.
Tolstoj, Aleksej N., Sobranie sočinenij v desjati tomach. Tom IV, Moskva, Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel’stvo Chudožestvennoj Literatury, 1958.
Trousson, Raymond, “I mondi alla rovescia. Finalità e funzioni”, Paesi di cuccagna e mondi alla rovescia, Eds. V. Fortunati - G. Zucchini, Firenze, Alinea, 1989: 17-36.
Varlamov, Michail, Michail Bulgakov, Moskva, Molodaja gvardija, 2008.
Viktorov, Boris, “Evrei na zolotom jaičke”, Global’nyj evrejskij onlajn centr. Jewish.ru, 12/12/2016, https://ttolk.ru/?p=15862 (ultimo accesso 21/04/2023).
Voronoff, Serge, Du crétin au génie, Paris, Fasquelle Editeur, 1946.
Zabolockij, Nikolaj, Ogon’, mercajuščij v sosude : Stichotvorenija i poėmy. Perevody. Pis’ma i stat’i. Žizneopisanie. Vospominanija sovremennikov. Analiz tvorčestva, Moskva, Terra, 1995.
Copyright (c) 2024 Marco Caratozzolo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, and to adapt the work. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).