Drawing the (Un)finished Line in The Mystery of Edwin Drood
Abstract
Studies devoted to The Mystery of Edwin Drood have tended, in some cases, to dismiss it as a great albeit incomplete novel, whereas others have pushed forward, rather than backward, the speculations raised by this text, with a series of hypotheses regarding the disclosure of the mystery, and its possible epilogue. Notwithstanding the status of Dickens’s last novel as an unfinished text, The Mystery of Edwin Drood features a closed narrative structure and may be studied as a finished text. Charles Allston Collins’s sketched wrapper design and Luke Fildes’s wrapper and illustrations reflect the novel’s mixture of symbolic and realistic elements and feature a complete visualisation of its main themes. In this respect, these visual texts may be also analysed and “read” as original and independent, rather than derivative, works. Finally, the mystery the title alludes to suggests the actual impossibility of disclosing all of the novel’s (and illustrations’) enigmas and encapsulates a paradigm of unsolvability that is central to The Mystery of Edwin Drood.
Downloads
References
Allingham, Philip V., “Sleeping It Off by Sir Luke Fildes”, The Victorian Web, https://victorianweb.org/art/illustration/fildes/d230.html (last accesses 26/07/2022).
Bal, Mieke, “Figuration”, PMLA, 119. 5 (2004): 1289-92.
Id., “Visual Essentialism and the Object of Visual Culture”, Journal of Visual Culture, 2.5 (2005): 1-32.
Bryson, Norman, “Introduction. Art and Intersubjectivity”, Mieke Bal, Looking In. The Art of Viewing, Amsterdam, G + B Arts, 2001: 1-40.
Cohen, Jane R., Charles Dickens and His Illustrators, Columbus, Ohio State University Press, 1980.
Collins, Philip, Dickens and Crime, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1965.
Collins, Wilkie, “Wilkie Collins about Charles Dickens”, Pall Mall Gazette, 20 January 1890: 3.
Connor Steven, “Dead? Or Alive?: Edwin Drood and the Work of Mourning”, The Dickensian, 430.89, Part 2 (Summer 1993): 85-102.
Dickens, Charles, The Mystery of Edwin Drood, Ed. with an Introduction and Notes by David Paroissien, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 2002.
Id., The Mystery of Edwin Drood. The Clarendon Edition, Ed. Margaret Cardwell, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1972.
Id., The Pickwick Papers, Ed. with an Introduction by James Kinsley, with Revised Notes by Kathleen Tillotson, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 1999.
Dillon, Steven, “Illustrations of Time. Watches, Dials, and Clocks in Victorian Pictures”, The Victorian Illustrated Book, Ed. Richard Maxwell, Charlottesville and London, University Press of Virginia, 2002: 52-90.
Duffield, Howard, “The Macbeth Motif in Edwin Drood”, The Dickensian, 30 (1934): 263-71.
Fildes, L.V., Luke Fildes, R.A. A Victorian Painter, London, Michael Joseph, 1968.
Golden, Catherine J., Serials to Graphic Novels. The Evolution of the Victorian Illustrated Book, Gainesville, University of Florida Press, 2017.
Goldman, Paul and Cooke, Simon, “Introduction”, Reading Victorian Illustration, 1855-1875, Spoils of the Lumber Room, Eds. Paul Goldman and Simon Cooke, Farnham, Ashgate, 2012: 1-11.
Harvey, John, Victorian Novelists and Their Illustrators, London, Sidgwick & Jackson, 1970.
Jacobson, Wendy S., The Companion to The Mystery of Edwin Drood, London, Allen & Unwin, 1986.
Joseph, Gerhard, “Who Cares Who Killed Edwin Drood? Or, on the Whole, I’d Rather Be in Philadelphia”, Nineteenth-Century Literature, 51.2 (September 1996): 161-75.
Kitton, Frederick G., Dickens and His Illustrators (1899), Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of the Pacific, 2015.
Kooistra, Lorraine Jansen, Poetry, Pictures and Popular Publishing: The Illustrated Gift Book and Victorian Visual Culture 1855-1875, Ohio, Ohio University Press, 1993.
Id., The Artist as Critic: Bitextuality in Fin-de-siécle Illustrated Books, Cambridge, Scholar Press, 1993.
Leighton, Mary Elizabeth and Surrige, Lisa, The Plot Thickens. Illustrated Victorian Serial Fiction from Dickens to Du Maurier, Ohio, Ohio University Press, 2018.
Mermoz, Gérard, “Rhetoric and Episteme: Writing About ‘Art’ in the Wake of Post-Structuralism”, Art History, 12.4 (December 1989): 497-509.
Michell, Charles, “The Mystery of Edwin Drood: The Interior and Exterior of Self”, ELH, 33.2 (June 1966): 228-46.
Orford, Pete, “The Mystery of Edwin Drood”, The Oxford Handbook of Charles Dickens, Eds. Robert L. Patten, John O. Jordan, Catherine Walters, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 2018a: 299-311.
Id., The Mystery of Edwin Drood. Charles Dickens’ Unfinished Novel and Our Various Attempts to End It, Barnsley, Pen and Sword Books, 2018b.
Patten, Robert, “Illustrators and Book Illustrations”, The Oxford Companion to Charles Dickens, Ed. Paul Schlicke, with a Foreword by Simon Callow, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 2011: 290-6.
Schlicke, Paul, “The Mystery of Edwin Drood”, The Oxford Companion to Charles Dickens, Ed. Paul Schlicke, with a Foreword by Simon Callow, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 2011: 398-402.
Tambling, Jeremy, “Pickwick Papers: The Posthumous Life of Writing”, The Oxford Handbook of Charles Dickens, Eds. Robert L. Patten, John O. Jordan, Catherine Walters, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 2018.
Tomaiuolo, Saverio, “‘A Strange Film Over Your Eyes’: Illustrations and Textual Duality in The Mystery of Edwin Drood”, Dialogic Dickens. Invention and Transformation, Eds. Allan C. Christensen, Francesco Marroni, and David Paroissien, Chieti, Solfanelli, 2015: 235-58.
Tracy, Robert, “Jasper’s Plot: Inventing The Mystery of Edwin Drood”, Dickens Quarterly, 23.1 (March 2006): 29-38.
Treuherz, Julian, Hard Times. Social Realism in Victorian Art, London, Lund Humphries in Association with Manchester City Galleries, 1987.
Wagner, Peter, “Introduction: Ekphrasis, Iconotexts, and Intermediality – the State(s) of the Art(s)”, Icons – Texts – Iconotexts, Ed. Peter Wagner, Berlin, De Gruyter: 1996: 1-40.
Walters, Cuming J., The Mystery of Edwin Drood by Charles Dickens. The History, Continuations, and Solutions, London, Chapman & Hall, 1912.
Copyright Notice
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, and to adapt the work. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
