Remades and their Sociospace in China Miéville’s Bas-Lag Trilogy

  • Camilla Del Grazia University of Pisa
Keywords: Simulacra, China Miéville, Posthumanism, Fantastic fiction, Urban fantasy


The aim of the present paper is to consider Remades (posthuman figures who populate China Miéville’s “Bas-Lag trilogy”) as simulacra of their social milieu, highlighting the interconnection of power and economic systems which shapes the “remaking” process and ultimately the position of Remades in society. Two methodological approaches are applied to the analysis. The first draws from Halberstam, Livingston and Micali to account for the “posthumanity” of Remades, interpreting them as liminal figures who physically summarise various categories of inhabitants of the Bas-Lag. The second moves from Foucault’s reflections on the relation between power and punishment and on the centrality of the body in this relation to determine how these categories – power and punishment – work in the context of the specifically posthuman bodies of Remades. Combining these perspectives produces interesting results. First, it can account for the “otherness” of Remades on the level of their physical transformation (from “whole” bodies to Remades) as well as on the level of their social position (from citizens, to prisoners, to outcasts). In addition to this, by providing some key examples, the paper foregrounds that, if the dialectical relationship between Remades and society is overtly inscribed on their bodies, different societies are likely to alter them in different ways. As a result, a totalitarian structure will inflict marks that are not superimposable with those produced by an egalitarian one.


Download data is not yet available.


Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacres et Simulation (1981), Engl. transl. by Sheila Faria Glaser Simulacra and Simulation, Ann Arbor MI, University of Michigan Press, 1994.

Burling, William J., “Periodizing the Postmodern: China Miéville’s Perdido Street Station and the Dynamics of Radical Fantasy”, Extrapolation, 50.2 (2009): 326-344.

Csicsery-Ronay, Jr., Istvan, On the Grotesque in Science Fiction”, Science Fiction Studies, 29.1 (2002): 71-99.

de Certeau, Michel, The Practice of Everyday Life, Engl. transl. Steven Rendall, Berkely/Los Angeles/London, University of California Press, 1988.

Downey, Dara-Kinane, Ian-Parker, Elizabeth, Landscapes of Liminality: Between Space and Place, London/New York, Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.

Ekman, Stefan, Here Be Dragons: Exploring Fantasy Maps and Settings, Middletown, Wesleyan University Press, 2013.

Foucault, Michel, Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison (1975), Engl. transl. by Alan Sheridan Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York, Vintage Books, 1995.

Freedman, Carl, Art and Idea in the Novels of China Miéville, Canterbury, Gylphi, 2015.

Gordon, Joan, “Hybridity, Heterotopia, and Mateship in China Miéville’s ‘Perdido Street Station’”, Science Fiction Studies, 30.3 (2003): 456-476.

Ead., “Reveling in Genre: An Interview with China Miéville”, Science Fiction Studies, 30.3 (2003a), 355-373.

Halberstam, Judith - Livingston, Ira, Posthuman Bodies, Bloomington/Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 1995.

Halberstam, Judith, Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters, Durham/London, Duke University Press, 1995.

Haraway, Donna, “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others, Cultural Studies, Eds Lawrence Crossberg-Cary Nelson-Paula A. Treichler, New York, Routledge, 1992: 295-337.

Jameson, Fredric, “Radical Fantasy”, Historical Materialism, 10. 4 (2002): 273-280.

Jordan, Justine, “A life in writing: China Miéville” The Guardian, 14.05.2011,, online (last accessed 26/03/2022)

Kristeva, Julia, Powers of Horror, New York, Columbia University Press, 1984.

Lefebvre, Henri, La production de l’espace (1974), The Production of Space, Engl. transl. Donald Nicholson-Smith, Oxford and Cambridge, Blackwell, 1991.

Micali, Simona, Towards a Posthuman Imagination in Literature and Media: Monsters, Mutants, Aliens, Artificial Beings, Oxford, Peter Lang, 2019.

Miéville, China., “Introduction. Symposium: Marxism and Fantasy” Historical Materialism, 10.4 (2002): 39-49.

Id., Perdido Street Station, London, Pan Books, 2011.

Id., The Scar, London, Pan Books, 2011.

Id., Iron Council, London, Pan Books, 2011.

Id., “Afterword. Cognition as Ideology: A Dialectic of SF Theory”, Red Planets: Marxism and Science Fiction, Eds Mark Bould-China Miéville, Middletown, Wesleyan University Press, 2009: 243-244.

Newell, Jonathan, “Abject Cyborgs: Discursive Boundaries and the Remade in China Miéville’s Iron Council”, Science Fiction Studies, 40. 3 (2013): 496-509.

Saunders, Robert A., “Mapping Monstrosity: Metaphorical Geographies in China Miéville’s Bas-Lag Trilogy”, Popular Fiction and Spatiality: Reading Genre Settings, Ed. Lisa Fletcher, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016: 157-176.

Soja, Edward W., Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory, London and New York, Verso, 1989.

Veloso de Abreu, Alexandre, “Unnatural London: The Metaphor and The Marvelous in China Mieville’s Perdido Street Station”, SCRIPTA, 22. 46 (2018): 193-201.

Williams, Mark P., “The Un-, Ab- and Alter-Londons of China Miéville: Imaginary Spaces for Concrete Subjects”, London in Contemporary British Fiction: The City Beyond the City, Eds. Nick Hubble- Philip Tew, London, Bloomsbury, 2016: 177-194.

How to Cite
Del Grazia, C. (2022). Remades and their Sociospace in China Miéville’s Bas-Lag Trilogy. Between, 12(24), 183-202.