A Psychopathology of the Expression. Federico De Roberto's Donato del Piano
Abstract
The paper focuses on the role of De Roberto in the shift from an objective to a subjective narrative, which takes place in the late 19th century literature. His subjectivism is neither romantic nor esthetical, but develops within a climate of scientific and literary thought, which results from the insight of positivist scientism.
Considering De Roberto’s prefaces, which testify to his eclectic poetics, the paper shows his concern with a problematic concept of realism, which draws upon Maupassant’s considerations on the relativity of true or truth.
Also, the study investigates to what extent De Roberto’s theoretical insights, as illustrated in his “Preface” to Documenti Umani, are implemented in Donato del Piano through creative writing, thus bespeaking a metanarrative dimension. The main character struggles with the impossibility of finding a full correspondence between his feelings and ideas and the words to voice them. He also struggles with the problems related to language, thus anticipating some aspects of Pirandello’s thought.
Another element of modernity is De Roberto’s perception of the unknowable nature of the Self, that he draws upon La Parole Intérieure by Egger who can be considered as the first theorist of the interior monologue.
Through an intertextual comparison with some of the outstanding authors in the context of Positivism (Maupassant, Taine, Egger), the study shows that De Roberto goes beyond simple forms of methodological eclecticism. Focusing on the recent achievements in psychology, De Roberto foreruns one of the major issues critical to the 20th century reflection over the crisis of subjectivity.
Downloads
References
Bourget, Paul, Nouveaux essais de psychologie contemporaine, Paris, Lemerre, 1886.
Bourget, Paul, Essais de psychologie contemporaine, Paris, Plon-Nourrit, 1908.
De Roberto, Federico, “Un tipo di umorista. Graindorge”, Il Fanfulla della Domenica, VI. 50 (14 dicembre 1884).
Id., “Il problema del bello”, Il Fanfulla della Domenica, VII. 38 (20 settembre 1885).
Id., Documenti umani, Milano, Galli, 1898.
Id., L’arte, Torino, Bocca, 1901.
Id., L’albero della scienza, Milano, Treves, 1911.
Id., “Prefazione a Documenti umani”, Romanzi, novelle e saggi, Milano, Mondadori, 1984.
Di Grado, Antonio, La vita, le carte, i turbamenti di Federico De Roberto gentiluomo, Roma, Bonanno, 2007.
Egger, Victor – Bergson Henri, Alle origini del flusso di coscienza. Con due lettere inedite di William James e di Henri Bergson a Egger, Ed. R. Roni, Pisa, ETS, 2016.
Egger, Victor, La parole intérieure. Essai de psychologie descriptive, Paris, Germer Baillière, 1881.
Inserra, Simona, La biblioteca di Federico De Roberto, AIB, 2017.
Loria, Annamaria, Rappresentare la realtà dopo la ‘crisi di fine secolo’. Relativismo e strategie stranianti nell’opera di Federico De Roberto, Tesi di Dottorato in Scienze letterarie, retorica e tecniche dell’interpretazione, XX ciclo, AA. 2006-2007.
Loria, Annamaria (ed.), Federico De Roberto. Il tempo dello scontento universale. Articoli dispersi di critica culturale e letteraria, Torino, Aragno, 2012.
Maffei, Giovanni, La passione del metodo. Le teorie, le poetiche e le narrazioni di Federico De Roberto, Firenze, Cesati, 2017.
Madrignani, Carlo Alberto, Illusione e realtà nell’opera di Federico De Roberto, Bari, De Donato, 1972.
Maupassant, Guy de, Préface a Pierre et Jean, Paris, Albin Michel, 1984.
Pirandello, Luigi, L’Umorismo, Milano, Mondadori, 1992.
Prudhomme, Sully, L’Expression dans les Beaux-Arts, Paris, Lemerre, 1883.
Taine, Hippolyte, Notes sur Paris: vie et opinions de M. Frédéric Thomas Graindorge, Paris, Hachette, 1877.
Tedesco, Natale, La norma del negativo. De Roberto e il realismo analitico, Palermo, Sellerio, 1981.
Turgenev, Ivan, “Amleto e Don Chisciotte”, «Rivista europea», XV (1879).
Vacante, Natàlia, Ai limiti del vero, Roma, Aracne, 2015.
Copyright Notice
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, and to adapt the work. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).