The Analogue Technology of S: Exploring Narrative Form and the Encoded Mystery of the Margin
Abstract
The 2013 publication of S, J.J. Abrams’ and Doug Dorst’s “love letter to the written word,” represents a particular intervention in the debates surrounding the future of the book and the relationship between analogue and digital publication. In S we see how the analogue nature of this particular book drives much of the narrative structure of the text, indeed the physical presentation of the book informs much of the imaginative contents of the narrative. In this article I would like to consider the theoretic bounds of this novel and its form, from the question of marginal (and fragmented) writing that is evoked in the work of Jacques Derrida, to the importance of the medium and the message that it carries as described by Marshall McLuhan. One could furthermore consider the manner in which S integrates itself into the imagination of the reader both in textual and in literal terms in light of Umberto Eco’s notion of the “open work.”Downloads
References
Abrams, J.J. – Dorst, Doug, S, Edinburgh, Cannongate, 2013.
Barthes, Roland, “The death of the Author”, Image, Music, Text, Trans. Stephen Heath, London, Fontana Press, 1977: 142-149.
Id., S/Z (1970), Trans. Richard Miller, New York, Blackwell, 1974.
Bazin, Patrick, “Toward Metareading”, The Future of the Book, Ed. Geoffrey Nunberg, Berkeley and Los Angeles, The University of California Press, 1996: 153-168.
Burroughs, William, Naked Lunch, New York, Grove Press, 1959.
Debray, Régis, “The Book as Symbolic Object”, The Future of the Book, Ed. Geoffrey Nunberg, Berkeley and Los Angeles, The University of California Press, 1996 : 139-153.
Derrida, Jacques, “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences”, Writing and Difference, Trans. Alan Bass, London & New York, Routledge, 2001: 351-370.
Id., Of Grammatology, Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Baltimore & London, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
Id., Glas, Paris, Galilée, 1974.
Eco, Umberto, The Open Work, Trans. Anna Cancogni, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1989.
Hales, N. Katherine, Writing Machines, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2002.
Hill, Logan, “A Long Time Ago, in a Universe More Analog”, New York Times, 27.10.2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/28/books/j-j-abrams-and-doug-dorst-collaborate-on-a-book-s.html?smid=pl-share, online (last accessed August 28, 2014).
Landow, George P., “Twenty minutes into the future or how are we moving beyond the book?”, The Future of the Book, Ed. Geoffrey Nunberg, Berkeley and Los Angeles, The University of California Press, 1996 : 209-239.
Id., Hypertext 3.0 Critical Theory and New Media in the Age of Globalization, Baltimore & London, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.
Lanham, Richard A., The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2006.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, The elementary structures of kinship, Trans. James H. Bell, Boston, Beacon Press, 1971.
Id., The raw and the cooked, Trans. John and Doreen Weightman, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1983.
Mallarmé, Stéphane, Un coup de dés jamais n’abolira le hasard, Paris, Gallimard, 1914.
McLuhan, Marshall, Understanding Media The Extensions of Man, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1994.
Murray, Janet H., Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1997.
Nabokov, Vladimir, Pale Fire, New York, Putnam, 1962.
Queneau, Raymond, Cent mille milliards de poèmes, Paris, Gallimard, 1961.
Robbe-Grillet, Alain, La Jalousie, Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1957.
Sterne, Laurence, The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman (1759), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009.
Toschi, Luca, “Hypertext and Authorship”, The Future of the Book, Ed. Geoffrey Nunberg, Berkeley and Los Angeles, The University of California Press, 1996: 169-209.
Copyright Notice
You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, and to adapt the work. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
