Death Drive and Critical Theory
Abstract
Much has been said about death drive in Critical Theory. This concept was mainly read as an aggressive and/or destructive drive. As a consequence, there are two ways of finding death drive in critical theories: the classic mode represented by Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse, and, more recently, Whitebook, in which death drive is seen as a factor that gives psychoanalysis its negativity face; or a way that leads to the despise of the nuclear function of death drive in psychoanalytic theory in name of normativity, as it happens in Fromm and Honneth. What I propose here is, from a comparison of both Freud’s texts, “Remembering, Repeating, and Working Through” (1914) and “Beyond the Pleasure Principle” (1920), to present a new way of appropriating the concept of death drive to produce a current critical theory. This means not considering the Wiederholungszwang as simply an imperative for coercion, but also a repetition compulsion. By proposing this reading of death drive (as suggested by Freud in 1920), I believe it is possible to amplify the range of possible connections between psychoanalysis and Critical Theory, keeping the negativity side, but without losing its normativity.
Downloads
References
Allen, A. (2020). Critique on the Couch: Why Critical Theory Needs Psychoanalysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. New York: Pantheon.
Butler, J. (2020). The Force of Non-Violence. Londres: Verso.
Fong, B. Y. (2016). Death and Mastery: Psychoanalytic drive theory and the subject of late capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Freud, S. (1999a). Erinnern, Wiederholen und Durcharbeiten. In Freud, Sigmund. Gesammelte Werke: Werke aus den Jahren 1913-1917. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.
Freud, S. (1999b). Jenseits des Lustprinzips. In S. Freud. Gesammelte Werke: Jenseits des Lustprinzips/Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse/Das Ich und das Es. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.
Fromm, E. (1971). The Crisis of Psychoanalysis. Greenwich (Conn): Fawcett.
Habermas, J. (1988). Individualisierung durch Vergesellschaftung. In J. Habermas, Nachmetaphysiches Denken. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (2011). Conhecimento e interesse. São Paulo: Unesp.
Hinshelwood, R. D. (1992). Dicionario do pensamento Kleiniano. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.
Honneth, A. (2009). Luta por reconhecimento: a gramática moral dos conflitos sociais. 2. ed. São Paulo: Editora 34.
Horkheimer, M. (1980). Teoria tradicional e teoria crítica. In W. Benjamin, M. Horkheimer, Th. W. Adorno, J. Habermas, Textos escolhidos. São Paulo: Abril Cultural: 117-161. Trans. by José Lino Grünnewald [et. al.].
Kristeva, J. (2004). Melanie Klein. New York: Columbia University Press.
Marin, I. L. (2022). Narcisismo e reconhecimento: os rumos da psicanálise na teoria crítica. São Paulo: Editora Unifesp.
Mcafee, N. (2019). Fear from Breakdown: Politics and Psychoanalysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
Nobre, M. (2004). A Teoria Crítica. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editor.
Whitebook, J. (1996). Perversion and Utopia: A Study in Psychoanalysis and Critical Theory. Cambridge: Mass. MIT Press.
Copyrights for articles published in Critical Hermeneutics are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Critical Hermeneutics is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence CC BY 3.0
. With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute and/or copy the contribution (edited version), on condition that credit is properly attributed to its author and that Critical Hermeneutics is mentioned as its first venue of publication.
