Beyond the Primacy of Representation
Abstract
The primacy of representation, to which – at least according to Paul Ricoeur – Edmund Husserl would have remained faithful, is radically questioned in Emmanuel Levinas’ famous essay on the "ruin of representation" (1959). The phenomenological structure of intentionality, in which “something appears as something”, confirms the need to “break out of the magic circle of representation”. Indeed, it is precisely by means of a detailed analysis of “intentionality”, insofar as the latter appears as characterized by an essential Mehrmeinun. Levinas brings out the overcoming of representation, that is, the abandonment of the latter's claim to subordinate thought to the objective necessity of presence. Within the horizon of presence, the necessity of being-thus-and-not-otherwise overwhelms the sense of the possible, and the actual evidence annihilates the being-able-to-be-otherwise of human experience. Through the analysis of intentionality and its potentiality, it is possible to bring out the transition from a philosophy of the necessary constraints of evidence, linked to the primacy of representation, to a philosophy of the power-able-to-be-otherwise. After all, the ruin of representation is the ruin of the instant or eternity of evidence, relegated into the actuality of consciousness. By subtracting itself from the self-referential necessity of evidence, the ethical Sinngebung evocated by Levinas at the end of his 1959 article connects intentionality to the sense of the possible, making explicit its openness to the future in radical form.
Downloads
References
Housset, E. (2020). De Husserl à Levinas : Cours d’Agrégation sur “ la représentation ” en phénoménologie. Caen : Université de Caen.
Husserl, E. (1969). Méditations cartésiennes. Paris : Vrin, Paris.
Jervolino, D. (2003). Introduzione a Ricœur. Brescia: Morcelliana, Brescia 2003.
Levinas, E. (1959). La ruine de la représentation. In Id., En découvrant l’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger. Paris : Vrin, 1967, 125–135.
Levinas, E. (1965). Énigme et phénomènes. In Id., En découvrant l’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger, cit., 203–216.
Levinas, E. (1975). Trois notes sur la positivité et la transcendance. J.-L. Marion (éd.), Positivité et transcendance. Paris : PUF, 2000.
Ricœur, P. (1986). À l’école de la phénoménologie. Paris : Vrin, Paris. Ricœur, P. (2004). Parcours de la reconnaissance. Trois études. Paris : Gallimard, 2013.
Waldenfels, B. (2002). Bruchlinien der Erfahrung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Copyrights for articles published in Critical Hermeneutics are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Critical Hermeneutics is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence CC BY 3.0
. With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute and/or copy the contribution (edited version), on condition that credit is properly attributed to its author and that Critical Hermeneutics is mentioned as its first venue of publication.
