Die Leiblichkeit in der reflexiven Anerkennung
Die Rolle der Entfremdung
Abstract
The paper aims to analyse the role of Entfremdung in the process of self-awareness. In the Anmerkungen zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität of 1920, Husserl reflects on the Entfremdung of the concrete bodily self, using the alterity or the meeting with the extraneous as a model. The conscious relation of the natural self to its soma (das Physische) is constituted in the context of the experience of the extraneous (das Fremde). The reference to the other than oneself also seems to occur in the transcendental self-reflection of the self, investigated in the late manuscripts on temporality (C- Manuscripts). Firstly, in such manuscripts, the living present (lebendige Gegenwart) is both identity and difference from self, and precisely as a continuous transition from identity to other-than-self, to difference from self, it constitutes the original ground of the transcendental ego. Secondly, it is possible to grasp a correlativity: that between the bodily self-reflection and the temporal self-reflection of the transcendental ego. Both are based on the opposition and mediation of subjective and objective. Following this path, it can be said that in the reflections on original temporality, the dynamics of bodily self-reflection are iterated: it is no coincidence that in the C Manuscripts Husserl designates the temporal Ego objectified in self-reflection as Non-Ego. Even in the case of the original temporal self-reflexivity, it is otherness that mediates the relation to the self, an otherness that is not identified with but connected to the transcendental body of others.
Downloads
References
de Warren, N. (2009). Husserl and the Promise of Time. Sub¬jecti¬vity in Transcendental Phenomenology. Cam¬brid¬ge: CUP.
Fuchs, Th. (2000). Das Gedächtnis des Leibes. «Phänomenologische Forschungen», V, 1: 71-89.
Fuchs Th. (2012). The Phenomenology of Body Memory. S. Koch, T. Fuchs (eds), Body Memory, Metaphors, and Movement. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam: 9-22.
Fuchs, TH. (2017). Ecology of the Brain. The Phenomenology and Biology of the Embodied Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Held, K. (1966). Lebendige Gegenwart.Die Frage nach der Seinsweise des transzendentalen Ich bei Edmund Husserl, entwickelt am Leitfaden der Zeitproblematik. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1950). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Hrsg. S. Strasser, Hua I. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1966). Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlesungs-und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918-1926. Hrsg. von M. Fleischer, Hua XI. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität Texte aus dem Nachlass Erster Teil: 1905-1920. Hrsg. von I. Kern, Hua XIII. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1973a). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubje¬ktivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil: 1921-1928. Hrsg. von I. Kern, Hua XIV. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (2006). Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929–1934). Die C-Manuskripte. Hrsg. von D. Lohmar, Hua Mat. VIII. Dordrecht: Springer.
Nobili, F. (2022). La prospettiva del tempo. L’idealismo feno¬me¬nologico di Husserl come autoesplicitazione della soggettività trascendentale. Milano – Udine: Mimesis.
Piana, G. (1965). Esistenza e storia negli inediti di Husserl. Milano: Lampignano Nigri Editore.
Pugliese, A. (2020). Io puro, io reale e storicità immanente del soggetto. A partire dal Bleistiftmanuskript (1912) di Husserl. «B@bel on line n.s.». VI: 55-66.
Rinofner-Kreidl, S. (2000). Edmund Husserl. Zeitlichkeit und Intentionalität. Freiburg – München: Karl Alber.
Weizsäcker, V. von (1986). Über neurotischen Aufbau bei inneren Krankenheiten (1926). Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 6. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Weizsäcker, V. von (1987). Gestaltkreis. Theorie der Einheit von Wahrnehmen und Bewegen. Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 4. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Copyrights for articles published in Critical Hermeneutics are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal.
Critical Hermeneutics is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence CC BY 3.0
. With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute and/or copy the contribution (edited version), on condition that credit is properly attributed to its author and that Critical Hermeneutics is mentioned as its first venue of publication.
