Hysteresis

For a Theory of Everything

  • Maurizio Ferraris University of Turin (IT)

Abstract

Perhaps the most relevant aspect of the ongoing philosophical transformation is the splitting of binomial speculation-idealism. Indeed, one can be both realist and speculative. The paper aims to show it through a definition of negative, positive, and speculative Realism and emphasises the speculative concept of hysteresis, i.e. the survival of effects to their own causes. Indeed, it is the fundamental principle at the basis of what exists (ontology), what we do (technology), what we know (epistemology), and finally of teleology (that is, of the interruption which, by putting an end to a process, simultaneously assigns a purpose to it).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allais, L. (2015). Manifest Reality: Kant's Idealism and his Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aristote. Analitici posteriori.
Aristotele. Metafisica.
Aristotele. Fisica.
Aristotele. De anima.
Bergson, H. (1965). Matière et mémoire. Essai sur la relation du corps à l’esprit [1896]. Paris: Les Presses universitaires de France.
Brandt, R. (1991). D’Artagnan und die Urteilstafel. Über ein Ordnungsprinzip der europäischen Kulturgeschichte 1, 2, 3/4, DTV 1998.
Braver, L. (2007). A Thing of This World: A History of Continental Anti-Realism. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Bryant, L. R. (2011). The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
Bryant, L., Srnicek, N., Harman, G. (a cura di) (2011). The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne, re.press.
Derrida, J. (1968). La différance. In J. D., Margini della filosofia. Torino: Einaudi 1997, 27–59.
Derrida, J. (1971). La scrittura e la differenza [1967]. Trad. it di G. Pozzi. Torino: Einaudi.
Eddington, A. S. (1987). La natura del mondo fisico [1928]. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Einstein, A. (1955). Für uns gläubige Physiker hat die Scheidung zwischen Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft nur die Bedeutung einer, wenn auch hartnäckigen, Illusion. Einstein Archiv Dokument, 7–245.
Ferraris, M. (2002). Inemendabilità, ontologia, realtà sociale. In Rivista di estetica, n.s., 19(1), 160–199.
Ferraris, M. (2004). Goodbye Kant! Milano: Bompiani.
Ferraris, M. (2015). Introduction to New Realism. London: Bloomsbury.
Ferraris, M. (2014). From Postmodernism to Realism. In T. Andina (a cura di), Bridging the Analytical Continental Divide: A Companion to Contemporary Western Philosophy. Leiden: Brill, 1–7.
Ferraris, M. (2015). Positive Realism. London: John Hunt Publishing.
Ferraris, M. (2020). L’esplosione della registrazione. In L. Taddio e G. Giacomini (a cura di), Filosofia del digitale. Milano-Udine: Mimesis.
Figal, G. (2006). Gegenständlichkeit. Das Hermeneutische und die Philosophie. Tübingen: Mohr.
Foster J. (2008). A World for Us. The Case for Phenomenalistic Idealism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gabriel, M. (2015). Fields of Sense: A New Realist Ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gratton, P. (2014). Speculative Realism. Problems and Prospects. Bloomsbury.
Hamilton Grant, I. (2006). Philosophy of Nature after Schelling. New York: Continuum.
Hanna R. et al. (2013). In Defense of Intuitions: A New Rationalist Manifesto. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Harari, Y.N. (2014). Da animali a dei. Breve storia dell’umanità. Milano: Bompiani.
Husserl E. (1998). Per la fenomenologia della coscienza interna del tempo (1893-1917). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Kant, I. (1980). Critica della ragion pura [1781/1787]. Torino: Utet.
Leibniz, G. W. (1765 post.). Nouveaux Essais sur l’entendement humain.
Mayergoyz, I. D., Bertotti, G. (a cura di) (2005). The Science of Hysteresis, 3 voll. Cambridge (Mass.): Academic Press.
Meillassoux, Q. (2012). Dopo la finitudine: saggio sulla necessità della contingenza (2006). Milano-Udine: Mimesis.
Nozick, R. (2003). Invarianze. La struttura del mondo oggettivo. Roma: Fazi.
Platone. Parmenide.
Platone. Repubblica.
Platone. Timeo.
Proust, M. (1993). Alla ricerca del tempo perduto, vol. IV, Il tempo ritrovato. Milano: Mondadori.
Rorty, R. (1981). Nineteenth-Century Idealism and Twentieth-Century Textualism. The Monist, 64(2): 155–174.
Rorty, R. (1998). Charles Taylor on Truth, in Id., Philosophical Papers, vol. III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 84–97.
Rovelli, C. (2020). Helgoland. Milano: Adelphi.
Simondon, G. (2008). Imagination et invention (1965-1966). Chatou: Éditions de la Transparence.
Spinoza. Etica (1677).
Stiegler, B. (2011). La technique et le temps 3. Le tempsducinéma et la questiondu mal-être. Paris: Galilée.
Westbury, C., Dennett, D. C. (2000). Mining the Past to Construct the Future: Memory and Belief as Forms of Knowledge. In Schacter, D. L., Scarry, E. (a cura di), Memory, Brain, and Belief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 11–32.
Whitehead, A. N. (2019). Processo e realtà [1929]. Milano: Bompiani.
Published
2020-12-17
How to Cite
Ferraris, M. (2020). Hysteresis. Critical Hermeneutics, 4(special II), 69-120. https://doi.org/10.13125/CH/4494