Issues in the Ontological Determination of Populism

Simonluca Pinna

doi:10.13125/CH/3712

Simonluca Pinna

Abstract

Populism is currently one of the most studied socio-political topics. However, no shared definition is present at the moment. Fortunately, common features are emerging in recent studies, so that the possibility to devise a comprehensive concept of populism does not seem illusory anymore. In this article I evaluate whether an ontological determination of the concept is conceivable, according to a critical and dynamical perspective. This means that epistemological questions are considered as fundamental, and ontology looks at dynamical systems theories in order to conceptually organize the outcomes of scientific researches. Taking advantage of ontological and system theoretic categories, I try to delineate some not obvious issues in the current approaches to populism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Attwood, B. (2008). In the Age of Testimony: The Stolen Genera-tions Narrative, ‘Distance,’ and Public History. Public Culture, 20(1), 75–95.

Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of Complex Systems. Reading: Addi-son-Wesley.

Bar-Yam, Y. (2004). Making things work. London: Knowledge Indus-try.

Bertalanffy, L. von (1968). General System Theory. Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller.

Bertalanffy, L. von (1972). History and Status of General System Theory. The Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 407–426.

Bousquet, A., and Curtis, S. (2011). Complexity theory, systems thinking and international relations. Cambridge Review of Interna-tional Affairs, 24(1), 43–62.

Chakrabarty, D. (2007). History and the politics of recognition. In Jenkins, K., Morgan, S., and Munslow, A. (eds.), Manifestos for History. London and New York: Routledge, 77–87.

Dornbusch, R., and Edwards, S. (eds.). 1991. The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fellman, P. V., Bar-Yam, Y., and Minai, A. A. (2015). Conflict and Complexity. Countering Terrorism, Insurgency, Ethnic and Regional Violence. New York: Springer.

Hartmann, N. (1924). Diesseits von Idealismus und Realismus, ein Beitrag zur Scheidung des Geschichtlichen und Übergeschichtlichen in der Kantischen Philosophie. Kant-Studien, 29, 160-206.

Hartmann, N. (1935). Zur Grundlegung der Ontologie. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Hartmann, N. (1938). Möglichkeit und Wirklichkeit. Berlin: De Gruy-ter.

Hartmann, N. (1940). Aufbau der realen Welt. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Hartmann, N. (1950). Philosophie der Natur. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Hawkins, K., and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). The ideational ap-proach to populism. Latin American Research Review, 52(4), 513–528.

Hirvonen, O. (2018). On the ontology of social pathologies. Studies in social and political thought, 28, 9–14.

Hirvonen, O., and Pennanen, J. (2018). Populism as a pathological form of politics of recognition. European Journal of Social Theory, 22(1), 27–44.

Honneth, A. (2014). The Diseases of Society: Approaching a Nearly Impossible Concept. Social Research, 81(3), 683–703.

Huggett, N., and Hoefer, C. (2018). Absolute and Relational Theories of Space and Motion. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 ed.). Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/spacetime-theories/

Laclau, E. (1977). Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism, Fascism and Populism. London: New Left Books.

Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

Liu, J. H., Onar, N. F., and Woodward, M. W. (2014). Symbologies, technologies, and identities: Critical junctures theory and the multi-layered nation-state. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 2–12.

Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposi-tion, 39(4), 541–563.

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mudde, C. (2017). Populism. An Ideational Approach. In Rovira Kalt-wasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., and Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–47.

Ostiguy, P. (2009). The high and the low in politics: a two-dimensional political space for comparative analysis and electoral studies. Kellogg Institute Working Paper #360. Notre Dame: Kellogg Institute for International Studies.

Ostiguy, P. (2017). Populism. A Socio-Cultural Approach. In Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., and Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 73-97.

Pinna, S. (2015). The Philosophy of Quantum Gravity – Lessons from Nicolai Hartmann. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 279–296.

Rooduijn, M. (2018). State of the field: How to study populism and adjacent topics? A plea for both more and less focus. European Journal of Political Research, 58, 362–372.

Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in an Age of Dis-trust (Vol. 7). Trans. by A. Goldhammer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rousseau, D., Billingham, J., & Calvo-Amodio, J. (2018). Systemic semantics: A systems approach to building ontologies and concept maps. Systems, 6(3), 32–56.

Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., and Ostiguy, P. (2017). Populism. An Overview of the Concept and the State of the Art. In Iid. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Ox-ford University Press, 1–24.

Sachs, J. (1989). Social conflicts and populist policies in Latin Ameri-ca. Working Paper 2897. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Eco-nomic Research.

Thompson, P. (2000). The Voice of the Past: Oral History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22.

Weyland, K. (2017). Populism. A Political-Strategic Approach. In Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., and Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 48–72.