Designing Latin America. Spatial justice, social hierarchy, and power practices
Abstract
Designing Latin America. Spatial Justice, Social Hierarchy, and Power Practices is an attempt to the codification of a discourse among some Latin America urban design and planning design experimentations of the 2000’s, whose disciplinary ties forged alliances with emergent structures of urban governance and whose professional means and ends implicitly aligned with postcolonial urban narratives. By excavating the struggles of decolonization around some Latin American cities and the growing asymmetries between the ‘Lettered’ and the ‘Unlettered’ city that resulted, it is possible to reveal the central role that architecture took on as both practice embedded in and discursive cypher for the unfolding of new power structures. In this sense, these reflections are an attempt to define an architecture’s response to the persistent colonial condition in states, cities and regions across Latin America and the rise of new forms of design and its power technologies meant to counter these in the context of the reaffirmation of neoliberal capitalism or neo-Bolivarian discourses.
Downloads
References
Blok, Anton. 1972. “The Peasant and the Brigand: Social Banditry Reconsidered”. ComparativeStudies in Society and History 14, no. 4 (September): 494-503.
Blok, Anton. 2001. Honor and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bracke, Sarah. 2016. “Is the Subaltern Resilient? Notes on agency and neoliberal subjects”.Journal Cultural Studies 30, no. 5: 839-55.
Brillembourg, Alfredo, and Hubert Klemperer, eds. 2011, Beyond Shelter: Architecture and Hu-man Rights. Melbourne: Metropolis Books.
Chandler, David, and Jon Coaffee, eds. 2017, The Routledge Handbook on International Resilien-ce. New York: Routledge.
Chibber, Vivek. 2003. Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capitalism. London: Verso.
Davis, Mike. 2007. Planet of Slums. London: Verso.
di Campli, Antonio. 2016. Densificar la ciudad. Cuestiones, problemas y diseño urbano en Ecuador.Quito:Abya-Yala.
Edensor, Tim, and Mark Jayne, eds. 2012. Urban Theory Beyond the West: A World of Cities.London: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel. 1980. “Questions on Geography”. In Power / Knowledge: Selected Interviewsand Other Writings, 1972-1977, edited by Colin Gordon, 63-77. New York: PantheonBooks.
Gehl, Jan, and Birgitte Svarre. 2013. How to Study Public Life. Washington: Island Press.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1975. Quaderni del carcere., vol. III. Torino: Einaudi.
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1959. Primitive Rebels. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1969. Bandits. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Hylton, Forrest. 2007. “Remaking Medellín”. New Left Review 44: 85-6
.Hylton, Forrest. 2006. Evil Hour in Colombia. London: Verso.
Leeds, Anthony. 1994. Cities, Classes and the Social Order. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lerner, Jaime. 2014. Urban Acupuncture, Celebrating Pinpricks of Change that Enrich City Life.Washington: Island Press.
Lobo, Susan. 1982. A House of my Own. Social Organization in the Squatter Settlements of Lima,Peru. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
Mackrell, Stuart, John Turner, et al. 1974. “Freedom to build: Squatter Settlements, Self Made Communities, Mass Housing in the Developing Countries, Do It Yourself Design, Parti-cipation and the Use of Power, The Profession's Role in an Explosively Divided World”.RIBAJournal 81.
McFarlane, Colin. 2008. “Urban Shadows: Materiality, the ‘Southern City’ and Urban Theory”.Geography Compass 2: 340-58.
Pieterse, Edgar. 2014. “Epistemological Practices of Southern Urbanism”. Accessed December 20,2017. https://www.africancentreforcities.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Epistemic-practices-of-southern-urbanism-Feb-2014.pdf.
Rama, Ángel. 1984. La ciudad letrada. Hanover: Ediciones del Norte.
Robinson, Jennifer. 2006. Ordinary Cities. Between Modernity and Development. London: Rou-tledge.
Roy, Ananya. 2005. “Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning”. Journal of theAmerican Planning Association 7: 147-58.
Roy, Ananya. 2011. “Postcolonial Urbanism: Speed, Hysteria and Mass Dreams”. In WorldingCities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, edited by Ananya Roy, and AihwaOng, 259-78. Hoboken, New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.
Roy, Ananya. 2015. “Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory?”. International Journal of Urban andRegional Research 40, no. 1: 200-09.
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
Schindler, Seth. 2017. “Towards a Paradigm of Southern Urbanism”. City. Analysis of UrbanTrends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 21, no. 147-64.
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven:Yale University Press.
Seal, Graham. 2011. Outlaw Heroes in Myth and History. London: Anthem Press.
Segal, Robert A., ed. 1990. In Quest of the Hero. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Slater, Tom. 2014. “The Resilience of Neoliberal Urbanism”. Accessed December 19, 2017.https://www.opendemocracy.net/opensecurity/tom-slater/resilience-of-neoliberal-urbanism.
Slatta, Richard, ed. 1987. Bandidos: The Varieties of Latin American Banditry. Westport, Connecti-cut.
Soja, Edward. 2000. Postmetropolis. Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Turner Bertha, eds. 1988. Building Community: A Third World Case Book. London: BuildingCommunity Books.
Turner, John. 1963. “Dwelling Resources in South America”. Architectural Design 33: 360-93.
Turner, John. 1965. “Lima's Barriadas and Corrolones: Suburbs vs Slums”. Ekistics 112: 152-156.
Turner, John. 1976. Housing By People: Towards Autonomy in Building Environments. London:Marion Boyars.
Turner, Victor. 1975. Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
Ungers, Oswald M. 1982. Architettura come tema / Architecture as Theme. Milan: Electa.
Yeoh, Brenda. 2001. “Postcolonial Cities”. Progress in Human Geography 25,no. 3: 456-68.
Copyright (c) 2017 Antonio di Campli

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Licenza Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).