Populism and Communication

Marco Canneddu, Livia Serlupi Crescenzi, Giovanna Leone, Fabrizio Martire, Christian Ruggiero

Abstract


The contribution aims, in its first part, at framing the populist phe-nomenon from the point of view of historical and political evolution of two interrelated processes: the praise of the direct representation of the popular will and the criticism and de-legitimization of the elite. These processes find a sudden acceleration at the time of disinter-mediation, which clearly demonstrates its dual nature as an object of study between politics and communication. The ability of political leaders to bypass the traditional structures of mediation (from Par-liament, in reference to political action, to the legacy media, in refer-ence to the relationship with the public) becomes over time directly proportional to their ability to adapt to the media logic. In the age of the hybrid media system, therefore, the strength of the populist leader lies in a careful use of old and new media, according to stra-tegic schemes and communicative styles that are summarized in the case studies selected in the second part of the contribution

Full Text:

PDF (Italiano)

References


Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2008). Introduction: The sceptre and the spectre. In Twenty-first century populism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–11.

Anselmi, M. (2017). Populismo. Teorie e problemi. Milano: Mondado-ri.

Bauman Z. (1999). Modernità liquida. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Berlin, I., Hofstadter, R. et al. (1968). To define populism. Govern-ment and Opposition, 3(2), 137–179.

Bobba, G. & McDonnell, D. (2016). Different types of right-wing pop-ulist discourse in government and opposition: The case of Italy. South European Society and Politics, 21(3), 281–299.

Bobba, G. (2018). Social media populism: Features and ‘likeability’ of Lega Nord communication on Facebook. European Political Science, 10.1057/s41304-017-0141-8, 1–13.

Bracciale, R., & Martella, A. (2017). Define the populist political communication style: the case of Italian political leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1310–1329.

Campus, D. (2006). L'antipolitica al governo: De Gaulle, Reagan, Berlusconi. Bologna: il Mulino.

Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. Houghton Mifflin: Harcourt.

Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political studies, 47(1), 2–16.

Carpignano P., Andersen R., et al. (1990). Chatter in the age of elecronic reproduction: Talk television and the “public mind”. Social Text, 25(6), 33–55.

Chadwik, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dittrich, P. J. (2017). Social networks and populism in the EU. Policy paper (Berlin: Jacques Delors Institute), 19.

Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue. Information, Com-munication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292.

Enli, G. (2015). Mediated authenticity. How the media constructs re-ality. New York: Peter Lang GmbH.

Enli, G., & Rosenberg, L. T. (2018). Trust in the age of social media: Populist politicians seem more authentic. Social Media+ Society, 4(1).

Hennessy, A. (1969). Latin America. In G. Ionescu & E. Gellner (eds), Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.

Inglehart, Ronald F. and Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. HKS Working Paper No. RWP16-026. Available at SSRN: or .

Inglehart, Ronald F. and Norris, P. (2019). Cultural Backlash. Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ionescu, G., & Gellner, E. (Eds.). (1969). Populism: its meaning and national characteristics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.

Jacobs, K., & Spierings, N. (2016). Social media, parties, and political inequalities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communica-tion style: An empirical study of political parties' discourse in Bel-gium. European journal of political research, 46(3), 319–345.

Kornhauser, W. (1959) The politics of mass society. London: Routledge e Kegan Paul Ltd.

Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378.

Lanzone L., Woods, D. (2015). Riding the Populist Web: Contextualiz-ing the Five Star Movement (M5S) in Italy. Politics and Governance, 3(2), 54–64.

Livingstone S., Lunt P. (1994). Talk on Television. Audience Participa-tion and Public Debate, New York/London: Routledge.

Lorusso A. M. (2018) Postverità. Fra reality Tv, social media e sto-rytelling. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Mazzoleni, G., & Bracciale, R. (2018). Socially mediated populism: the communicative strategies of political leaders on Facebook. Pal-grave Communications, 4(1), 50.

McAllister, I. (2005). The personalization of politics. In The Oxford handbook of political behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mény, Y., and Surel, Y. (2000). Par le peuple, pour le peuple. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard.

Mény, Y., and Surel, Y. (2001). Populismo e democrazia. Bologna: il Mulino.

Mény, Y., and Surel, Y. (2002). The constitutive ambiguity of popu-lism. In Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 1-21). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mény, Y., and Surel, Y. eds. (2002). Democracies and the populist challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and opposition, 39(4), 541–563.

Shils, E. A. (1956). The torment of secrecy: The background and consequences of American security policies. Glencoe: The Free Press.

Taggart, P. (2002) Il Populismo. Traine (En): Oasi Editrice srl - Città Aperta Edizioni.

Taguieff P.A. (2006). L’illusione populista. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.

Tarchi, M. (2015). Italia populista. Dal qualunquismo a Beppe Grillo. Bologna: il Mulino.

Tsfati, Y., & Ariely, G. (2014). Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries. Communication Research, 41(6), 760-782.

Walicki, A. (1969). Russia. In G. Ionescu & E. Gellner (eds), Popu-lism: Its meanings and national characteristics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.

Wiles, P. (1969). A syndrome, not a doctrine: Some elementary the-ses on populism In G. Ionescu & E. Gellner (eds), Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics. London: Weidenfeld & Nichol-son.

Wirth, W., Esser, F., Wettstein, M., Engesser, S., Wirz, D., Schulz, A., & Schemer, C. (2016). The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication. Zurich: NCCR Working Paper, 88.




NBN: http://nbn.depositolegale.it/urn%3Anbn%3Ait%3Aunica-24862

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13125/CH/3710

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Marco Canneddu, Livia Serlupi Crescenzi, Giovanna Leone, Fabrizio Martire, Christian Ruggiero

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

Creative Commons License              ISSN 2533-1825

Critical Hermeneutics is published by the University of Cagliari - Maintenance for this OJS installation is provided by UniCA  Open Journals, hosted by Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo.