Un regard épistémologique sur la comparaison

Silvana Borutti


This article attempts to deliver an epistemological look at a differential and contrastive kind of comparison. A differential comparison aims to avoid the epistemological prejudices of the similar and of the universal, and assumes the principle of the co-presence and of the non-hierarchic relationship between texts put in a comparative relation. By referring to Wittgenstein’s concepts, I maintain that comparing is not simply seeing (observing), but rather “seeing as”, seeing according to a schematizing rule which offers the comparative criterion by showing the relevant traits of the phenomena put in a synoptic co-presence. I also point out that this comparative procedure is related to Peirce’s hypothetical and indirect inference which consists of collecting different data and formulating a configuration hypothesis that gives a coherent form to the data.

Full Text:

PDF (Français)

NBN: http://nbn.depositolegale.it/urn%3Anbn%3Ait%3Aunica-22227

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13125/CH/3142

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Silvana Borutti

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

Creative Commons License              ISSN 2533-1825

Critical Hermeneutics is published by the University of Cagliari - Maintenance for this OJS installation is provided by UniCA  Open Journals, hosted by Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo.