https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/rhesis/issue/feedRhesis. International Journal of Linguistics, Philology and Literature2025-04-15T17:20:18+02:00Redazione Rhesisrhesis@unica.itOpen Journal Systems<p><em>Rhesis. International Journal of Linguistics, Philology and Literature</em> is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal, founded in 2010 and published by the Department of Letters, Languages and Cultural Heritage of the University of Cagliari. It published two issues, <em>Rhesis – Linguistics and Philology</em> and <em>Rhesis – Literature</em>, on a yearly basis. Both issues contained research articles and notes.</p> <p>In 2023, Rhesis underwent a significant change in its publishing model, becoming an Open Access journal on the <a href="https://ojs.unica.it/">OJS </a>(Open Journal Systems) platform of the University of Cagliari. It also moved from publishing issues on an annual basis to publishing articles continuously as soon as they are accepted and typeset. This enables a more frequent and timely dissemination of research.</p>https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/rhesis/article/view/6521Double Visions2025-04-15T17:20:18+02:00David Ian Luckingdavidianlucking@gmail.com<p><span lang="EN-US">This article examines Rudyard Kipling’s <em>Kim</em> and E.M. Forster’s <em>A Passage to India</em> from the point of view of the religious elements, deriving from Buddhism and Hinduism respectively, contained within them. What is entailed by the clash of cultures depicted in both works is a confrontation between different conceptions of the world, and more especially of the value of action within that world. If the story of the Buddha, and more particularly of the Bodhisattva, provides Kipling with a metaphor for the complementary quests of Kim and the lama in <em>Kim</em>, it is I suggest one of the cardinal religious texts of Vedantic Hinduism, the <em>Bhagavad Gita</em>, that provides the metaphorical underpinnings of <em>A Passage to India</em>.</span></p>2025-04-03T17:38:08+02:00##submission.copyrightStatement##https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/rhesis/article/view/6395Ecocritical perspectives:2025-04-14T18:55:25+02:00Gioiella Bruni Rocciag.bruniroccia@lumsa.it<p>The divide between the humanities and the natural sciences is often seen, still nowadays, through the lens of the famous “two cultures” controversy surrounding C. P. Snow’s 1959 lecture. The purpose of this paper is to reconsider this much debated question in the light of the emerging field of ecocriticism, which is devoted to understanding and explaining the literary representation of the relationships between human beings and the natural environment. From this standpoint, Charlotte McConaghy’s debut novel, <em>Migrations</em> (2020), may be considered as an exemplary case of eco-narrative and, more specifically, of climate fiction. The analysis aims at showing how this narrative text is able to embody the core values and specific conditions of the human and physical worlds. The main purpose of this study is to underline how the ecocritical perspective, through genre hybridization and blending, helps bridge the gap between natural sciences and humanities.</p>2025-04-14T18:55:25+02:00##submission.copyrightStatement##