Call for Papers Vol. 3, n.2, December 2019

Personal Identity: An issue that Demands Revision in Today’s Philosophical and Interdisciplinary Dialogue

 Guest Editors: Beatriz Contreras Tasso, Patricio Mena Malet

 Deadline (full paper): 1 December 2019

 

The issue of human identity faces a radical questioning from the late modernity with the irruption of suspicion with Marx, Nietzsche and Freud. This criticism is based on the collapse of the Cartesian Cogito, which supported the thesis of self-transparency and immediacy of the self to consciousness and its power as the absolute basis of knowledge.

Today, after the influence of the philosophies of difference and deconstruction, the notion of identity has lost its prestige and it is necessary to rethink in what terms it is still possible to refer to something like personal identity.

One of the contributions of the hermeneutical phenomenology of the works of Paul Ricœur and other philosophers in the line of consequentialism, like Derek Parfit, has been to carry out a critical reflection of the identity issue in dialogue with other scientific approaches, including neurosciences, psychoanalysis, sociology, linguistics, Marxism, literature, to name the most important.

From this perspective, it would be valuable to have contributions that could explore the issue of human identity in a diversity of domains and languages, (ethics, politics, art, neuroscience, psychiatry, and technology) in order to offer different angles and access to the identity issue, which would also allow the examination of the many problems that arise from this issue. Possible topics include (but are not limited to):

 

1. Ipseity and its dynamic relationship with the personal and collective sphere.

2. The relation of identity with otherness: archaeological perspective like in Psychoanalysis, or contextual perspective like in Marxism?

3. Temporality and its incompletion: how is it possible to think of identity in the continuum of technological transformation?

4. Narrative identity: how can today's world literature contribute to strengthening Ipseity?

5. Does the analysis of social transformations, the consideration of sexual struggles or demands and feminisms represent a new challenge for reflection today?

 

Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to follow the Author Guidelines in preparing the manuscript for submission. If necessary, the editors will exercise the right to alter/modify manuscripts  in accordance with the stylistic and formal lines of the journal. 

Submission of papers to Critical Hermeneutics is taken to imply that the manuscript is not under consideration by other journals, and that it is not a published work.  

This Journal follows a double-blind refereeing process for each submission. The reviewers' evaluations determine whether a paper will be accepted or rejected in accordance with four criteria: 1) Excellent: the paper does not need any change; 2) Good: the paper needs minor changes; 3) Interesting: the resubmission is recommended after consistent changes and/or revisions; 4) Insufficient: the paper is rejected. 

In case of resubmission (points 2 and 3), the same reviewers will be charged to re-evaluate the paper.

The peer-review process, as the complete editorial workflow, is managed within the Open Journal System (OJS) platform.

 

1. Language

The manuscript can be submitted in one of the following languages: Italian, French, Spanish, German, Portuguese, or English (British or American standard; not the mixture of both). All manuscripts will be submitted (and possibly published) with two abstracts (maximum length of 150 words for each one), one in English (British or American standard) and one in the language of the manuscript. Keywords (from 3 to a maximum of 5) will be indicated accordingly.

Manuscripts with significant grammatical or syntactical mistakes/problems will be immediately discarded without starting the refereeing process.   

 

2. Length of paper 

The length of the paper should not exceed 50000 characters (spaces included). Articles should be typed in 1,5 space, including footnotes and references (placed at the end of the paper).  

 

3. First Page / Title Page

First Page / Title Page is a separated page before the text, which starts with the abstracts. It must include the following information:

-  Title

-  Author(s)'s name(s) and affiliation(s)

-  Telephone number and e-mail address

During the process of refereeing  this first page will be separated from the rest. During the double-blind refereeing process the author must not be recognised by the referees. The manuscript and the reference must thus be suitable for blind review.

 

4. Subdivision of the article

It is highly recommended to clearly articulate the paper in numbered and titled paragraphs/sections. Sections should be numbered 1, 2, 3, etc. Internal subsections should be numbered 1.1., 1.2., 1.3., ... 2.1., 2.2., etc. 

 

5. Style

Authors should follow the latest APA style edition (see, www.apastyle.org), which is the editing style followed by CH.  

 

6. References

Authors should arrange the references accordingly with the latest APA style.