Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Between is the international, peer-reviewed and open access Journal of the Italian Association for the Theory and Comparative History of Literature - Compalit.

Between aims to provide an up-to-date observatory, a meeting place at which the methods and research that Italian comparative studies stimulate and participate in, can be brought to fruition. In this sense, the journal title alludes to the desired role of the trait d'union, linking Italy to other countries in Europe and in the world.

Our journal encourages comparison between models and proposals in constant evolution, between local and international perspectives, and between literary tools and those of other fields of knowledge for which literature may prove to be an unanticipated resource.

Between covers the following subjects: comparative literature; theory of literature; cultural studies; postcolonial studies; geocriticism; narratology; translation and adaptation studies; thematic criticism; genre criticism; literature and visual arts; literature and new media; literature and music; although other topics will be considered.

 

Section Policies

Atti Compalit Napoli 2015

Editors
  • Francesco Cattani
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Introduction

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Manifesto

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Presentazione

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Cartographies of Comparative Studies

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Geocriticism, Geopolitics: The Gaze of the Other

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Myths and Themes of Crossing Over

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Writing and Visions: Threshold Crossings

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Bibliographical Update: Ed. Marina Guglielmi

This section is closely linked to those topics addressed in the monographs of the given issue, from which a bibliographic update from at least the past five years will be derived. 

Ed. by Marina Guglielmi.

Editors
  • Marina Guglielmi
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Myths and Themes

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Genres and Forms

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Metamorphosis of the Imaginary

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Unity, Opposition, Connection

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Davanti alla legge

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Adattamento

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Narratives on Law, Narratives in Law

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Legislation regarding Literature and the Arts

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Literature and Human Rights

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Before the Law: an Introduction

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Theoretical Issues

Editors
  • Emanuela Piga
Checked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Myth and Poetry

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Between Dance and Music

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

On Stage

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Words and Images

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

On the Screen

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Figures of Desire

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Rhetorics of Desire

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

The Theme of Desire

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Dynamics of Seduction

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Closing Remarks

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Insegnamenti

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

L'insegnamento raccontato

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

L'insegnamento di Remo Ceserani

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

L'insegnamento vissuto e discusso

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Da Remo Ceserani: conclusione

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Sguardo d'apertura

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Corpi eloquenti

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Immagini che spiegano

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Stili della sospensione

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Persuasivi e sovversivi

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Immaginazione media visualità: il dominio spettacolare

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Immaginazione media visualità: analisi del visivo e transmedialità

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Intergeneri e apporti cognitivisti

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Telling, Hesitating, Envisaging. Sites of the uncanny

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Contemporary Dynamics of the Actio. Poetics and Politics of the Theatre

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

From the Fields of Theory. Rethinking the Functions of Rhetoric

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Ore Rotundo. Ethics of Public Intervention

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Our Orients. Otherness, Body, Translation

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

In the Texts. The Long Modernity of Elocutio

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Theoretical Frameworks: Orality, Media, Digital Memory

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Powers of Artistic Creation. Ideations and Crossings

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Tecnologia, immaginazione e forme del narrare

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Between Literature and Digital Culture: Intersections and Contaminations

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Metamorphoses of Narration

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Intermediality, Transmediality, Fan Fiction

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

TV Serials and New Reception Models

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Narratives of the Technological Imagination

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Visual Technologies and Digital Arts

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

In discussion: Ed. Niccolò Scaffai

The aim of this section  is to engage with a recent work of art – be it literary, cinematographic, or from the fine arts – that gives rise to theoretical and comparative reflection. Critics, writers, and artists will be invited to participate in the debate to take place on the chosen works.

Ed. by Niccolò Scaffai

Editors
  • Niccolò Scaffai
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Rereading: Ed. Clotilde Bertoni

This section aims at rediscovering various kinds of comparative studies: scientific essays, newspaper articles, reviews, interviews. Our purpose is to reconsider, and sometimes to rescue from oblivion, works either by scholars of the field, or by scholars of other fields, by writers, by journalists; concentrated both on genres or themes crossing different cultures, and on the condition or the meaning of our branch, and even on its recurring eclipses and crises. To compare and to interweave our glance with glances from the past often turns to be extremely useful: it throws light upon features and metamorphoses of a lot of problems; it spurs on reflection and at the same time it warns against its mistakes and imbalances.

Ed. by Clotilde Bertoni

Editors
  • Clotilde Bertoni
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Conversation Pieces / Interviews: Ed. Massimo Fusillo

 Situated midway between orality and writing, the interview is certainly one of the trickiest genres, especially because of the complex relationship that established between the co-authors. Instead of aiming to discover presumed authorial “truth”, in this section we will rather report on exchanges with writers, poets, artists, critics, theorists, and scholars, convinced as we are that this more “militant” aspect should also be part of a topical comparative literature journal.

Ed. by Massimo Fusillo

Editors
  • Massimo Fusillo
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Between the Texts / Reviews: Ed. Giulio Iacoli and Marina Guglielmi

The primary goal of this section is to decipher, as far as immediately possible, the “signals” that comparative reflection sends out to us today, within Italy and beyond. Aided by a large group of young scholars, we have read a series of texts which we esteem to be original, inspiring, and revealing. 

We disclose them here to our readers, aware of the fact that the prerogatives of a new journal include enabling our readers to participate in the critical debate that good books (as well as numerous journal monographs and web pages) contribute to delineating and developing.

Ed. by Giulio Iacoli

Editors
  • Giulio Iacoli
Checked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Censorhip and Self-Censorship

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

L'immaginario politico

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Letteratura e politica: Teoria e prassi

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Theories, Forms, Institutions

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Politics and Crossover Literatures

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Commitment, Resistance, Ideology

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Narratives and Imaginaries in Politics and History

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Etica, estetica e politica

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Logics of Power, Practices of Resistance

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Walls, Screens, Photographs - Planes of Censorship

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Canons

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Regimes of the Sayable

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Politics and ethics of Lyric Poetry

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Politics on Stage

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Peer-review process 

The selection of referees for each manuscript is a responsibility of the guest editors and the editorial board. The selection depends on many factors, including the referee’s experience, competence and his/her previous collaboration with Between.

Each submitted manuscript is firstly read by at least one of the guest editors who, upon considering it suitable for publication after a first screening, send it to at least two referees for a thorough assessment.

The method Between recurs to is that of the "double-blind" review, where the author does not know the name of its referees and the referees do not know the name of the author of the work that they are evaluating.

The aim is to provide authors with a clear and competent specialised opinion on the quality of the proposal submitted. When necessary, the review provides the author with guidelines for improving his/her essay. Both the guest editors and the editorial board are responsible for the final decision on the article’s publication.

The peer-review process, and all the editorial workflow, is managed through the OJS platform.

 

Publication timetable

Between guarantees the author to respect the time schedule indicated below for the editorial process:

  • A reading by the guest editors, with notice of rejection or assignment to referees for peer-review (within 12 weeks from submission);
  • First round of peer-review (4 weeks from the assignment date);
  • Communication to the author of the referees’ judgement (within 16 weeks from the submission deadline);
  • Time for possible or necessary change by the author (2 weeks from the referees’ requests);
  • Definitive editorial decision (within 2 weeks from the submission of the amended version).

Publication Frequency

Between publishes two issues a year, in May and November.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal does not charge APCs or submission charges.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Between  is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence 3.0.

With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.

Between, having published these contributions, will have the right to publish them integrally or partially as reprints or as monographic issues, both in electronic version and in printed copies.

 

Publication ethics and malpractice statement

Between is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal. Between’s ethic statements are based on the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors developed by the COPE - Committee on Publication Ethics.

It is necessary that all the different parties involved in the publishing of each article (authors, editors-in-chief, editorial board, editors of single issues, reviewers) agree upon the following standards of ethical behavior.

 

GENERAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND EDITORIAL BOARD

Publication Decisions

Guest editors and journal editors are responsible for the peer-review process and both parties decide whether the submitted articles should be published or not. The final decision is communicated to the author within 16 weeks from the submission. In case of a contrast between two opinions, the editor may seek the advice of a third referee.

Fairness

The editors evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, political philosophy or academic affiliation of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editorial board involved in the process must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers and other editorial advisors, as appropriate.

Between guards in its archives the results of the peer-review processes for each article (published or not).

Disclosure Process and Conflict of Interest

The editorial board commits not to use unpublished materials from submitted articles without the express written consent of the author.

Between recurs to the same peer-review process for contributions submitted by members of the editorial board.

Quality

The editorial board verifies every six months the review process in order to improve its results.

 

GENERAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF REVIWERS

Contribution to editorial decisions

The double-blind peer-review process assists both the editors in their decisions and the authors in improving their articles.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the article for which his/her contribution is requested or unable to submit his/her review within the 30 days schedule should immediately notify the editors.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts must be treated as confidential material. They must not be shown to or discussed with others unless previously authorized by the editors.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews of submitted manuscripts are to be objective. The reviewers must express their opinions, exclusively about the article, with a clear argumentation through a standard form provided to them by editors.

Disclosure Process and Conflict of Interest

Information and indications obtained during the peer-review process must be considered as confidential material and they are not to be used for personal purposes. Reviewers must not accept any manuscript for which a potential conflict of interest exists.

If the reviewer asks for changes as a condition to publish a particular article, and the editors consider them appropriate, he/she will have the opportunity verify that the author of the reviewed article has adopted them before giving the final approval.

 

 

GENERAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORS

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors have to submit only original and unpublished research. They need to provide for their articles correct indications of all bibliographic sources and/or any other accessed material.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publications

An author should not submit manuscripts already published or under review process in another journal. Submitting the same manuscript simultaneously to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior, thus it is unacceptable.

Between keeps the right to republish texts previously published elsewhere, providing a clear reference to the original publication. Articles published in Between may be republished on other websites and blogs, with the previous approval of the editorial board.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the research and work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the submitted articles.

Authorship

Authorship must be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution and interpretation of the submitted article. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Those who have substantially participated in the research project should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

In case of article written by different authors, the submitting author must ensure that all other co-authors are included and acknowledged, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission to the journal for its publication.

Disclosure Process and Conflict of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.

Errors in published works

When an author discovers an error or inaccuracy in his/her own published article, he/she has to notify the journal editors or the editorial board promptly and cooperate with them in order to correct it.

 

PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE PUBLICATION ETHICS

If a member of the scientific board, a reviewer or an author violate one of principles mentioned before, his/her contribution to Between will no longer be accepted.

If an article does not comply with these ethic statements, it will be expunged and replaced by a note explaining that the article previously published was removed as it did not respect the journal’s publication ethics.

 

Indexing

Between is indexed by the following abstracting and indexing services: